Do some stores return policies have the same equivalence as finding a $100 on the road?

I have found money on the street before, and of course kept it. I have lost money before, and I did not expect it back. A person cannot "identify" money if they lost it, so I would not consider keeping lost money found on the street stealing.In regards to having and wearing something for a period of time then returning it for a refund or credit, it depends.

I have returned a pair of shoes I bought four months after I purchased them. I wore them to work only, and the glue and heel were separating. Now for the amount I paid, yes you better believe I returned them.

The store gave me a credit. I also returned a dress before and the store did not want to accept it. They said because there was deodorant on it, so it had to have been worn.

My question to them was to prove I was the only individual that tried on the dress prior to me purchasing it. Needless to say, I got the store credit. Now if I bought a dress or shoes, left the tags on, went dancing in it, and then returned it...... I would consider that a dishonest gesture, but not stealing because you did not take it without a form of payment.

Define "exploiting. " Is it exploitation if I buy a jacket that, a year later, is falling apart despite the fact that I took good care of it? I don't think so, especially if I invest a decent amount of money in a jacket that was allegedly well made.

If I buy a Walmart special off their clearance rack, I don't expect nearly as much quality as if I go shop at, oh, pretty much any other store that sells jackets. Is it exploitation if I return the jacket after one year because I've gained thirty pounds and the sucker doesn't fit me anymore? I think so, because the weight gain is not the store's or manufacturer's fault.

They didn't guarantee that my jacket would always fit me well, so they should not be expected to pay for what's not their fault. Is it exploitation if I return the jacket just because I need money for something else? I think so, because the store and manufacturer aren't in charge of my finances.

Basically, I think that the "no questions asked" return policies are wonderful when I really need them for a legitimate reason - as in my first example. However, I've had the displeasure of meeting a few swindlers who happily return stuff to get the cash, even though the problem is entirely their own fault. They're abusing the policy, and they're the reason why some stores have tightened their policies.

One store (can't remember which one, sorry) used to have a "no questions asked" policy for everything that they sold. However, too many people were scamming them out of laptops and other computers. These scammers would buy the new computers, use them without problems for a year or more, then return them for full retail price - and use the cash to buy another, new system.

Basically, they were upgrading their computers for free, and the store and manufacturers were eating the losses big time. Now, the store has a sixty-day return policy on all electronics, which sucks if your iPod or whatever has a defect that doesn't present until the seventieth day or something. Now, you have to go to all the trouble of returning the defective item to the manufacturer because a bunch of scammers cheated the returns policy.

That sucks for honest consumers, which is why I dislike the scamming so much - it has a direct effect on me, and on other people who are simply trying to get what they have every right to expect as consumers.

There are certain people who would take advantage of this. However, I think the vast majority of people see this as stealing from the store. Return policies exist to protect consumers against their own mistakes, as well as the store's mistakes.

If somebody buys something and legitimately does not like it, or if it doesn't fit, or if they realize they can't afford it, they should be able to return it. But if somebody wears it for a year, gets it dirty, etc, they should not be able to return it. That would be taking advantage of a store's return policy, which would make it more likely for the store to change that policy.In turn, that would hurt the honest consumers.

Websites should have clear return policies. If a website charges customers a re-stocking fee, has a complicated return procedure, or doesn’t allow returns at all, don’t do business with them. Look for websites with flexible return policies.

Stores should give customers ample time to return products. Many stores give customers at least 30 days, but some offer 45 or 60 days to return items. In addition, review the website’s re-stocking and shipping fees.

The best return policies offer free return shipping, or the option to return products to a brick and mortar store. Some stores require that customers cover the cost of return shipping, which can get costly for large or heavy pieces of furniture. Some stores also charge a re-stocking fee, which can total as much as 15% of the item’s purchase price.

Avoid online retailers that charge re-stocking fees. Pro Tip: Search for the term “return” when reading merchant reviews to learn more about other customers’ experiences returning items to the website. Most stores list their shipping policy on their FAQ or About pages.

Thoroughly review a store’s shipping policies before buying furniture from the website. Different stores use different shipping companies, such as FedEx or UPS, and offer different shipping and handling rates. Some stores hike up the cost of shipping, or charge a handling fee to counteract the lower prices they offer on their furniture.

Do not buy any furniture without reviewing the shipping and handling fees first. Pro Tip: Free shipping doesn’t always mean free.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions