Do the Republicans REALLY want to win office again in 2012? If so, why not pick an ELECTABLE candidate?

Thank you for your questions. We hope you had an opportunity to watch the GOP debate on Saturday, Dec. 10, to see how the candidates addressed some of the issues you raised. If you didn’t see the debate, turn to Yahoo!

News and ABC News’ coverage at the links below to read about the candidates’ stances on issues based on your questions. Thanks again for your questions and for participating! Analysis: Newt Gingrich survives first big night of attacks http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/analy... What now?

Why the next 10 days are the most critical of the GOP campaign http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/now-w... Yahoo! Readers rate the debate: ‘$10,000 is more than some people make in a year’ http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/yahoo... Full Transcript: ABC News Iowa Republican Debate http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/full-transcript-abc-news-iowa-republican-debate/story?id=15134849.

Most if not all the GOP candidates have said we should not raise taxes on the rich Job Creators, and also if we give rich people a tax cut this will create lots of jobs from the Job Creators. I think that we should go one step further and send all the rich Job Creators a check for some amount of money and this obviously will create lots more jobs. If everyone has a job we will be able to collect lots more income tax from the people who will now have a job that was created by the rich Job Creators.

I think we can raise the taxes on these newly employed people to pay an extra tax to support this program and they should not complain about paying the tax because they now have a job and that would be much better off than living on welfare and or losing their house and every thing else if they remain unemployed. This new expense would also be partially offset by a decreasing amount of unemployment payments as people get jobs. This would be a new tax, but probably not on rich people because they would not be the people getting these jobs.

As soon as we have full employment we can quit sending money to the rich Job Creators and then we could quit collecting this new tax. This will help balance the federal budget as these people start to pay their regular income tax. This will expand the number of people that pay income tax.

I have no idea how much money we would have to give to the rich Job Creators and this is where the candidates come in, they need to come up with the figure of how big of a check to send to these rich Job Creators. I cannot see any down side to this new program and if most people think about this I am sure they will think this is a good idea. This will not be a wealth transfer program because these people getting the money are already rich.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.