Does AK-47 7.62mm bullet have more range and stopping power than a 5.56mm NATO bullet?

I have an AK-47 type 56 Chinese. I also reload for it. I also own a Bushmaster XM-15A2 (AR-15A2)and reload for it also The AK projectile is a .310 diameter bullet usually weighing 123 grains.

Because of it being a .30 caliber it does have more knockdown power than the .223 Rem. (5.56 NATO)because of the bullet weight. The 5.56 NATO used to be a 55 grain projectile but the U.S.Government has changed the weight to a 62 grain bullet with the issuing of the A2 rifles The M16A2 has a 1 in 7 twist rate in the barrel.

That means 1 full rotation of the bullet inside the barrel in 7 inches of barrel. The 5.56 NATO is much more accurate on point targets than the 5.563X39mm (AK) round The AK is very effective out to about 250 meters but really drops like a rock. The 5.56 NATO is deadly accurate out to 550 meters So the AK round has more knockdown power because it's a heavier bullet; more lead, but the M16A2 cartridge is far more accurate at ranges exceeding 300 meters Yes this is all true.

The Ak-47 cartridge has double the knockdown power of an AR-15/M-16 style weapon (Black Rifle). The Ak-47 round weighing at 123 grains travels at a muzzle velocity of 2340ft per second (1114ft per/sec. Spd of sound) divided by muzzle velocity equates to Mach speed.

The rate at which the projectile outruns the speed of sound which is 760 mph. Multiply this and the bullet speed in mph results.1600mph for an ak-47 and 1900-2100mph for m4/m16 (4 inch barrel differentiation) So the the AK is considerable more powerful and closer distances but the bullet drops 25 inces and 300 meters compared to 7 inches for the AR style weapons at the same distance. The AR style weapons are accurate out to 550m for point targets human silhouettes and 800m for are targets (i.e.

Dumpsters). Hope this helped.

During the last decade there have been several attempts to get the United States to replace the 5.56mm rifle round with something more powerful. A 6.8mm round was popular for a while but never caught on. Now there's a new round, the 300BLK.

This is a 5.56 bullet using a similar size (35mm long) cartridge as the 5.56mm round. Thus, all you need is a new barrel for your M-4 or M-16 rifle. The larger and heavier 5.56mm round is more effective at blasting through walls and doors and many troops believe it has better stopping (of soldiers it hit) power.

American troops would sometimes use captured AK-47s (and their 5.56mm ammo) to test this theory. This fed the demand for something like the 300BLK. A year ago, the 300BLK was approved for manufacture, and tests both on and off the battlefield are under way.

The 300BLK can use the same magazines as the 5.56mm round. But the fate of the 6.8mm round should be considered before declaring the 300BLK has a bright future. Six years ago the new 6.8mm rifle round developed for SOCOM (Special Operations Command) became available commercially as the 6.8mm Remington SPC (Special Purpose Cartridge).

There were some problems in manufacturing the 6.8mm SPC. Remington began work on the new round in 2002. It used the case from the old Remington .30-.30 (which was not a true .30-.30, as it was rimless).

SOCOM began testing the 6.8mm round in M-16s and M-4s modified to accommodate it. The 6.8mm round was more accurate at longer ranges and had more hitting power than the 5.56mm round the M-16 was originally designed for. Out to about 600 meters the 6.8mm round had about the same impact as the heavier 5.56mm round used in sniper rifles and medium machine-guns.

The 6.8mm, 5.56mm, 300BLK, and 5.56x39 AK-47 round are all considered "assault rifle" rounds. This concept of a less powerful rifle round came out of research begun towards the end of World War I. During the 1930s, the Germans studied their World War I experience and concluded that a less powerful and lighter rifle round would be more effective.

This resulted in research on a smaller 7mm round, but with World War II fast approaching this effort eventually produced a shortened regular (5.567mm) rifle round. During that war, the Germans developed the first modern assault rifle, the SG-44. This weapon looked a lot like the AK-47 and that was no accident.

The SG-44, like the AK-47, used a shortened rifle cartridge that was developed before the war (5.567mm for the Germans, 5.56mm for the Russians, which is still used in the AK-47). This gave the infantryman an automatic weapon that could still fire fairly accurate shots at targets 100-200 meters away. The SG-44 and the AK-47 had about the same stopping power as the 6.8mm SPC and 300BLK at those shorter ranges.

What a coincidence. The AK-47 didn't have the accuracy of higher powered bullets but the Russians didn't see this as a problem, because most troops using it had little marksmanship training. If they had to kill someone they could fire at full auto.

The U.S. M-16 and its high speed 5.56mm round, was more accurate than the AK-47 when firing individual shots at shorter ranges. But the wounding power of the 5.56mm (.223 caliber) bullet fell off rapidly at ranges over a hundred meters. The American military, and especially SOCOM, train their troops to fire individual shots and do it with great accuracy at any range.

A number of new rifle sights have made it even easier to do and makes first round hits at longer ranges easier to make. This made the longer range shortcomings of the 5.56mm round more obvious. SOCOM used the 6.8mm round in Iraq and Afghanistan and the troops liked it, but not enough to cause widespread adoption.

There was also resistance from senior (non-SOCOM) generals to any consideration for replacing the 5.56mm round with the 6.8mm. To further complicate matters, there was a new 6.5mm “Grendel” round being tested as well and some troops preferred it to the 6.8mm SPC. This was because the 6.5mm round is more accurate than the 6.8mm one at ranges beyond 500 meters.

At the moment, no decision has been made about any replacement for the 5.56mm round. The 300BLK is unlikely to change that.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions