Given NCTQ's long-standing criticism of education schools, how can it claim to be impartial?

NCTQ has a strong track record of producing fair and objective studies. While we do not defend the status quo, we are deeply committed to high-quality formal teacher preparation. In fact, we consider education schools to be necessary, whereas many education reformers dismiss teacher preparation, arguing that the only solution to improving teacher quality is to attract more talented people to the profession.

Unfortunately, studies that compare teachers who enter the classroom with little or no training with those who have gone through undergraduate or graduate-level teacher preparation find no aggregate difference in performance. Only one conclusion can be reached: Most education schools but not all are not adding value. NCTQ believes that teacher preparation, if it were selective and rigorous, can and should add real value.

More.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions