Data that covered the entire area were considered better than those representing a subset of the area. €¢ How well did the data represent the levels of contaminants in the CMP area? Data sets that represented more frequent monitoring efforts for the same contaminants were considered better than those that had less routinely collected data.
€¢ What could the data tell us about the size of a potentially exposed population? Researchers prioritized data sets that indicated that a large portion of the population could have been exposed to contaminants. €¢ Were the data actual measures of contaminants in the environment or reported emissions or chemical releases?
Researchers were more confident in measured levels of contaminants in the environment than in data that reported industrial emissions or chemicals released to the environment. €¢ Do the data suggest that people actually could have had contact with the contaminant? Exposure is contact with a contaminant.
Without exposure there can be ... more.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.