Is nerve sparing Surgery as effective as traditional surgery in treating Prostate Cancer?

Dr. William Catalona, who has performed more nerve-sparing radical prostatectomies (3381) than anyone in the United States, said that with an experienced surgeon and effective pre-operative testing, nerve-sparing surgery has a high success rate. Nerve-sparing surgery is not for everyone, and patients who were impotent before surgery are not candidates for nerve-sparing surgery. "The first priority is to remove all the cancer," Dr. Catalona said."If tests show that the cancer has spread beyond the margin of the Prostate|prostate gland, the cavernous nerves must be removed because we know cancer cells travel along the spaces surrounding those nerves.

"One concern of nerve-sparing surgery is the risk of not removing all the cancer. "Theoretically, because nerve-sparing surgery preserves the soft tissues around the prostate, there is a higher risk for cancer recurrence," Dr. Catalona said. That theoretical concern is seldom the outcome in Dr. Catalona's patients.

In studies of his patients, Dr. Catalona found that the recurrence rate for cancer is actually less in men who have had nerve-sparing surgery. He believes that finding is a consequence of performing the surgery on men who have the most favorable conditions for the operation in the first place, and he emphasizes that early diagnosis is extraordinarily helpful in obtaining good results. Other information on Nerve Sparing Surgery:http://www.supportiveoncology.net/journal/articles/0502089.pdfhttp://www.prostate-cancer.org/education/localdis/Tewari_NerveSparingRP_Trizonal.htmlhttps://www.virginiamason.org/home/body.cfm?id=1050.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.