Is a restated document required when submitting an individually designed plan for review within its remedial amendment cycle, or can all the amendments be attached to the existing document?

A restated document is generally required for an individually designed plan submitted for a letter within the applicable remedial amendment cycle. See section 7.04 of Rev. Proc. 2010-6 and section 12.03 of Rev. Proc.

2007-44. More.

A restated document is generally required for a VS and M&P plan, except when an adopting employer to an M&P plan makes changes to the underlying plan document. Any changes adopted by the employer must be made in the form of an amendment and not incorporated into the underlying M&P plan document. Changes to a pre-approved VS plan may either be incorporated into the VS document or made as separate “tack-on” amendments to the plan.

If the changes are incorporated into the document, the application must also include a list describing the changes. 3. Has the Service determined whether employers filing off-cycle applications for determination letters under section 14 of Rev. Proc.

2007-44 will be processed in any order and will priority be given to some of these applications? Generally, off-cycle applications will not be reviewed until all on-cycle plans have been reviewed and processed. However, under Rev. Proc.

2007-44 some applications will be given the same priority as on-cycle ... more.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.