Should tags be mandatory instead of optional?
I can't imagine an automatic system that would not be absurd and misleading. Most questions and answers don't deserve to be found anyway. People who care use logical tags.
Tags should only be mandatory when the question or answer involves beer, ale, or stout. That would help people find the important questions and answers.
People would just add odd tags that don't fit. Then you would just have junk.
However, House Transportation Chair John Mica proposes to continue the program but make the funding optional instead of mandatory. The program accounts for less than 2% of total SAFETEA-LU funding. Optional, but preserved instead of eliminated.
Sounds reasonable, right? Most bike-ped advocates disagree.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.
Related Questions
Is EndInvoke() optional, sort-of optional, or definitely not optional?
Not doing something right with my tags my tags are red your tags and everybody tags are white?
Should vaccinations be mandatory? Or should Holistic health be mandatory?
Does it subtract from readability / is it confusing to use non-optional method parameters in C# as if they were optional?
Castor (Introspection) generated object not validaing mandatory tags are passed or not?
Suggestion: Answers should inherit tags from the question, it saves the answerer from having to retype tags that are relevant?