What do you think about the controversy about people not believing we really did land on the moon?

I personally believe they did it, because fakes never last and it would be a serious political problem if it was a lie. So they would not risk. But I always wonder the same thing: "Why we haven't been to the moon since?".

Anyway, we are on Earth and there is so much to do down here... (If all due respect for astronauts and science professionals, they make a great work).

I believe we did. I think people should stop critisizing every single move someone makes!

There are several reasons for the halting of the manned explorations of the moon. 1) Cost - The Apollo Program in its entirety (Research & development, procurement of spacecraft and launch vehicles, administrative and personnel costs over a period of 10 years) cost roughly $24 billion at the time ($170 billion in 2005 dollars) 2) Loss of Public Interest - Public support for the Apollo Program fell dramatically as soon as John F. Kennedy's dramatic goal of landing a man on the moon was achieved by Apollo 11 in 1969.

By the time of the Apollo 13 accident, the public perceived going to the moon as boring, routine, and wasteful of government funds. By 1971, public interest was so low that the last three Apollo missions (18, 19, and 20) were scrapped, even though all of the hardware (launch vehicles and spacecraft) had already been bought and paid for. In the end, even paying the people personnel necessary for a successful mission to the moon was considered to great a waste of taxpayer money.

3) Lack of Tangible Economic Benefits - While man's journeys to the moon brought back a wealth of scientific data and a better understanding of the origins of the moon, our Earth, and the solar system, these alone weren't deemed enough to justify the cost of continuing such exploration. It's been said that even if there were gold bars just lying on the surface of the moon, the cost of getting there and bringing them home far outweigh the potential profit. 4) The Nature of the Apollo Program - While Apollo was and remains to be perceived as a purely scientific and technical undertaking, the truth is, its origins are firmly founded in the politics of the cold war.

America had been embarrassed by the Soviet Union's numerous firsts in space (first man made satellite, first man in space, first space walk, etc.), and landing a man on the moon was largely undertaken to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt the scientific, technological, and economic superiority of the United States. As soon as this goal was met, political support dried up, and along with it, the funding necessary for continued lunar and space exploration. Since the Apollo 17 mission in 1972, no human being has left the orbit of the Earth.

There are several reasons for the halting of the manned explorations of the moon. 2) Loss of Public Interest - Public support for the Apollo Program fell dramatically as soon as John F. Kennedy's dramatic goal of landing a man on the moon was achieved by Apollo 11 in 1969.

By the time of the Apollo 13 accident, the public perceived going to the moon as boring, routine, and wasteful of government funds. By 1971, public interest was so low that the last three Apollo missions (18, 19, and 20) were scrapped, even though all of the hardware (launch vehicles and spacecraft) had already been bought and paid for. In the end, even paying the people personnel necessary for a successful mission to the moon was considered to great a waste of taxpayer money.

3) Lack of Tangible Economic Benefits - While man's journeys to the moon brought back a wealth of scientific data and a better understanding of the origins of the moon, our Earth, and the solar system, these alone weren't deemed enough to justify the cost of continuing such exploration. It's been said that even if there were gold bars just lying on the surface of the moon, the cost of getting there and bringing them home far outweigh the potential profit. 4) The Nature of the Apollo Program - While Apollo was and remains to be perceived as a purely scientific and technical undertaking, the truth is, its origins are firmly founded in the politics of the cold war.

America had been embarrassed by the Soviet Union's numerous firsts in space (first man made satellite, first man in space, first space walk, etc.), and landing a man on the moon was largely undertaken to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt the scientific, technological, and economic superiority of the United States. As soon as this goal was met, political support dried up, and along with it, the funding necessary for continued lunar and space exploration. Since the Apollo 17 mission in 1972, no human being has left the orbit of the Earth.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions