What is the difference between unconditional response and unconditional stimulus?

Unconditioned response and unconditioned stimulus are both concepts that are necessary to understand in Pavlov’s classical conditioning. Probably it would be best to understand that these two are connected not different. Since without stimulus, there is no response.In Pavlov’s classical conditioning, a naturally occurring stimulus is always paired with a response.

The main idea here is that by introducing a neutral stimulus, and conditioning the subject to associate the neutral stimulus with the naturally occurring stimulus, the behavior will be learned. In this experiment, Pavlov used naturally occurring events, called unconditioned stimuli, to extract an unconditioned response from the animals. This was best illustrated in his famous dog experiment.

Pavlov found out that his dogs salivated when they heard the sound of a bell, which the dogs associated with food. Initially, in this experiment the unconditioned stimuli was the food and the unconditioned response was the salivation. Later, the unconditioned stimulus (food) became associated with the neutral stimuli (the bell), which became a conditioned stimulus.

Therefore, there is a change of the unconditioned stimulus as there is also a change in the unconditioned response. That is, it turned into a conditioned response after the associative learning occurred. For more easy understanding on this classical conditioning theory, go to .

eruptingmind.com/pavlov-classical-condit....

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.