Which foreign policy method worked better; Republican regime change or Democratic regime change?

Obama's non aggressive foreign policy got diplomats killed in Benghazi, he did strongly warn Syria not to cross a red line he would not tolerate of using chemical weapons though, but when they did he has done nothing about it. Then guess what happened, N. Korea, launched some short range missiles because they no longer are concerned about any repercussions from Obama's non aggressive foreign policies.

Non aggression is a fine thing so long as it has a healthy mix of aggression as well. We have to show strength occassionally or our words are meaningless.

If Republicans really want to win, they have to stop saying that lower taxes for the rich will stimulate the economy and create jobs. It just doesn't fly in the 21st century.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.