Which is better for the NFL, the pre-salary cap days with a couple of dynasties, or the everyone-is-a-contender modern days?

I thnk that, though everyone may be a contender, there are still dynasties. The cap was implemented in 1994. Since then, the Patriots are the most obvious, winning three Superbowls and losing one.

But other teams have stayed strong as well, the Broncos won two back-to-back, and the Cowboys won two a year apart. Other teams have held strong positions, without necessarily winning multiple Superbowls. The Rams were the Greatest Show on Turf, later the Colts have been constantly near the top.

Given that, I like the new version better. Though, being a Redskins fan, it would be funny to see just how much Dan Snyder can spend without creating a real team.

I don't find there is a lot difference it all comes down to who manages money better. Most of the big market teams still end up near the top each year.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.