Which match will be the main event at Wrestlemania 29: Cena vs the Rock or Cm Punk vs the Undertaker?

Yeah, I'm 100% sure that CM Punk would lose WWE Title to The Rock at Royal Rumble 2013. There's no way WWE would let The Rock this one. The Rock had to look strong going into Wrestlemania 29.

And by having The Rock as WWE Champion going into WM 29, Wrestlemania would get a lot of buyrates, maybe the highest one ever, surprassing Attitude Era Wrestlemanias. And about The Undertaker, I think he should face Brock Lesnar. The Undertaker had beaten Punk before time and time again.

Taker just squashed Punk with ease in 2009. And now Punk's a wrestler who couldn't win on his own, he always needs help. I don't know how anyone could believe Punk stand a chance of ending Taker's ending Streak if Punk is booked this way.

I would prefer Taker face Brock Lesnar, a man whom Taker had never beaten. Brock always beat Taker in 2002-2003. So, Taker had to avenge his losses to Lesnar.

The only way I want to see Punk vs Taker happening at WM 29 is if Punk remains WWE Champion. Punk had to defeat The Rock at Royal Rumble 2013 and I really want Punk to beat The Rock "CLEAN". His recent dirty successful title defenses had make Punk look like a coward who always needed back up.

I want to see Punk beat Rock CLEANLY, FAIR, AND SQUARE at Royal Rumble 2013. This will pretty much shocked the whole world and make him stand the chance of ending Taker's Streak at WM 29. BQ : - The Undertaker vs Brock Lesnar No Holds Barred match for The Streak with Triple H as The Special Guest Referee.

(I think Triple H wouldn't wrestle at WM 29 since he didn't have any opponents) - John Cena vs The Rock (c) vs CM Punk Triple Threat for WWE Title - Randy Orton vs Dolph Ziggler (c) for World Heavyweight Title - Ryback vs Wade Barrett (c) for Intercontinental Title.

Whoever Undertaker faces has to have something on the line to match his streak. If Punk is still champion at Wrestlemania, surly he would defend the title against Cena and not Undertaker, as Undertaker is basically, at this stage of his career, less than a part time performer. I think that WWE has left it too late to come up with a believable angle for Undertaker at Wrestlemania.

What would the point in Undertaker facing a returning wrestler from the past be, they get nothing out of beating Undertaker (except a boost to the ego) and Undertaker gets nothing from beating them.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.