Who do you think is better in their respective sport, Tiger Woods or Roger Federer?

IMO Tiger Woods is your answer. First, he is the first athlete to be on track to earning $1 billion (see msnbc.msn.com/id/25691350/ns/business-fo... ). Second, he is by far the single most dominant player in the history of his sport.

While Federer is certainly at the summit of his sport, there have been many others over the years who dominated tennis similarly. Thus, though a straight apples to apples comparison is impossible, by these two indirect measures, Tiger wins.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.