They were right there doing the same as they are vermin who suport vermin and hate morally upstanding people.
One tosses pejorative insults to amuse an audience that not in any way believes they are fact - even if they agree with the opinion or the metaphor. The other carefully lays out a twisted and fallacious case that he then claims as proof of immoral behavior on the woman's part and then uses the most vile words for the alleged behavior, doubles down and says it over and over. Not as opinion, not as metaphor, not even humorous - just a vile assertion repeated over and over.
The two sets of 'nasty words' do not even compare with one another.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.