Why does the WWE continue to repeatedly push Shane McMahon as a wrestling star?

Coming out to attack the man that attacked your father, regardless of how badly it was done, is not being pushed as a wrestling star. When he was younger, Shane did have some great feuds and matches. The hardcore McMahon did the job well, he was never a technical wrestler but neither was stone cold or the rock.

Big Shows career died? When was this because I remember him feuding with the undertaker last year, not something that is given to a dead career. I am glad the WWE doesn't hire writers of your quality, you would bury anyone that doesn't fit the batista mold.

The angle made sense, it was just badly done. More.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.