Will radio waves, burning salt water at 1200 degrees, and stirling engine solve the world energy problems?

What would help is if you stop believing everything you see on the Y0000-t00000b. There's a whole lot of entertainment but very little reality there. Go learn something real-- a little chemistry, a little Physics-- it's not that hard to grasp the basics.

That will do you a lot of good in the long run. A little history would help too-- Lookup how long the Stirling Engine has been around (hundreds of years), and see how many places it's actually used, in an actual product, not some video demo (none). What does that tell you?

I want new news, not old antagonistic arguments that say nothing. GoldenLion 1 month ago .

You want news, here's news (to you): You can't burn water. You can't burn salt water. The chemistry and physics of water have been well-known for 150 years or so.

You can't make something from nothing. You can't extract energy, or burn, something that is already completely burnt. Most of the stuff on YouTube is for entertainment.It's not a good source of "news", as it's usually defined-- something new and factual.

Quite the opposite. Grow up. You're getting mighty old to be believing in fairy stories.

Of course you can burn salt water if the covelant bonds between hydrogen and oxygen are broken. Hydrogen burns. The question is if the radio waves and burning water are net positive.

GoldenLion 1 month ago .

Le's all just give up--- Senor GL has no appreciation for things like facts, numbers, percentages, efficiencies and the like. But show him something on the yooooo-tooooob, and he's as excited as a puppy. He doesn't know or care how much power goes in, how much gets converted to microwaves, how much of that actually dissassociated water, how much of that burns, and how much of that heat is converted by the Stirling engine to actual work.

Never mind that we KNOW that about 1000 Watts are going in, and maybe 1 Watt of actual mechanical work is coming out. GL sees something spinning, and like a toddler, he's fascinated by that, never mind that the overall efficiency, far from being "unlimited energy", is actually losing 999 parts per thousand as waste heat. He sees the spinning thingy!

That's enough to excite him into a frenzy. Never mind that it takes almost no actual energy to spin a thingy.... it's a spinning thingy! I wonder how he is at the circus.

No. They haven't been able to make the sterling engine work for cars. What makes you think they can make it work for anything else?

Who can make a sterling engine work in Minissota in the winter time? Radio waves won't do much and where do you get the energy to burn salt water at 1200 degrees? You must believe in perpetual motion machines.

The heat is causing a stirling engine to run. Don't be an AC. Speak the truth.

GoldenLion 1 month ago .

My favorite is the uranium-eating bacteria that poops electricity.

No, you can't burn salt water. You can burn the H and O you get after you split the water. And if you want, you can split water with radio waves, but it's been known for about 80 years what the efficiency is of this.

You're about 80 years behind the curve on this one, buddy. Plus, there's the general, overarching law of Conservation Of Energy, which if you believe in it, you don't even have to analyze each specific situation, you just know that you're not going to get more out than you put in. If you have proof of the violation of the L C E, you can start writing your Nobel acceptance speech right now.

Otherwise, can it.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions