Would Paul Ryan as VP choice be the nail in the coffin for Romney?

Both. It was a good choice, because it solidifies Romney's creds with Republicans, conservatives and tea party extremists, who were all going to vote for him anyway. It was a bad choice, because the moderate and independent voters, who will actually decide the election, are turned off by extremist views in government, and want more cooperation and compromise to fix our issues.

Ryan's extremist views don't cut it. And, it was an irrelevant choice. People generally don't vote for a President, based on whom he choses to be the VP.

Ryan brings economic creds, but doesn't add to the ticket in any other way. Romney already claims he has the economic sense, so choosing another economic guy doesn't make sense. The President has more influence in the foreign policy arena, than in the domestic economy.

Clearly Republicans are betting on the economy being the only issue with voters. With problems in Syria and Iran and North Korea - there is NO ONE at the top of the ticket with ANY foreign policy experience, and with Americans already sick of 12 years of war, having unproven, untested, and inexperienced foreign policy makers in office doesn't bode well for us.

He made an excellent choice, and could have done much worse. FACT All liberals will insult Romney, anything he does or says, and ANY choice for VP he made. They weren't going to vote for him before, they aren't going to vote for him now...

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.