Can’t any religious concerns people have be dealt with by only legalizing same-sex civil marriage and letting religions define religious marriage?

It is a common fallacy to think that there are two kinds of marriages—civil and religious. In fact, there is only one institution of marriage in any society, and there can be only one, since marriage cannot at the same time mean the union of a man and a woman and also the union of any two individuals. It is also essential to understand that governments did not “create” marriage.

It is a “pre-political” social institution, meaning that it was created by societies before the social institution of government was created. In simple societies, marriage was regulated by customs, mores, taboos and other means. As societies became more complex, the more recent institution of government was enlisted to regulate marriage.

So while there is a governmental element, it is only supporting a social institution that had already been long established. More.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.