I believe she is guilty. And, the prosecutor failed to connect the dots. The defense did an excellent job of putting mud in the water and making the situation more complicated.
The prosecutor behaved as if her guilt was apparent, instead of immediately shifting to address the defense's issues. They were caught with their pants down, with no return to the child abuse and swimming pool defenses. They also could have added more charges for the jury to use instead of first degree murder and a death sentence.
If you're going to sentence a young pretty woman to death, you better show the smoking gun in her hand.
I think she is guilty as sin but whom am I to judge that is God's job.
She is a murderer! But, killing the BORN is death to the blind and wicked. Both of which seem to have a case?No.
She's in paste. Heart built on sand melts. A recorrection, sand meets eye, don't want to see.
SEE? Whisper pistol.. it's a Gun. No one there to see her.
She's dead, lying corpse. Bends, a lit shudder. Who wants to cry when you have tears in heaven?
You should, brat. She's lucky of killing you. "No," you say.
A divorce, shallow pity.
She's lucky of killing you. "No," you say. A divorce, shallow pity.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.