CREATIONISTS: Can you find any scientific holes in the theory of evolution?

The authors of "What is creation Science" do an excellent job of outlining why evolution does not stand up to true scientific scrutiny. The basic flaw is the extremely rare frequency of related genetic abnormalities required to further a species. Coupled with the fact that there has never been observed any abnormalities that have led to the creation of a new species or "jumping species boundaries".

Evolutionist and mathematician Thomas Huxley calculated the odds of a horse evolving from a single celled animal in the allotted 5 billion years (10 to the 18th power seconds) in the allotted space, (the known universe at 10 to the 80th power atoms) at a dismal 1 in 10 to the 3 millionth power. Scientific conferences over the years (1967 Wistar institute) have repeatedly shot down evolution as the engine responsible for explaining the presence of higher life forms. BUT, at the same time those same scientists have refused creation.

This tells us that those scientists that still push this "religion" are doing so through shear politics, not science. Charles Darwin himself noted that in order for evolution to work, missing links had to be commonplace. They are not.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.