Dhoni won’t be sacked as a captain, no matter how poor India does. Do you agree with Cricbuzz?

He's partly right but he shouldn't of come in public about his opinions. He is still playing under Dhoni's captaincy in the same team. This will only affect individual as well as the the team's performance.

Rifts have never been helpful for any team. As for your question, yes, strong players (team) makes the captain's job much more easier. We have seen that in case of the Aussie team under Ponting but a captain still plays a vital role in team's formation.

A captain should be able to motivate his team and if he's successful in doing that, the team automatically starts winning.

He said " we won coz team was strong and not coz of dhoni ONLY", there isn't any as such wrong in the statement... media is interpreting the statement in it's own usual manner. It's obvious that each player contributes in a match.... and the role of a captain is a bit more and significant.... but his contribution is not 100% na.. if he said "not coz of dhoni(his captaincy)" ( no "only") then it's bad.... coz he played a big role in WC2011,2008.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.