I think I'll actually have a stab at this. 1) Well spotted, Sherlock... have you looked at humans very recently? There are roughly 7.5 billion of us wandering around on this planet.
Only a small percentage of the world is homosexual. I know it's a popular piece of propaganda the conservatives like to spin that allowing gays rights will mean that we will all become gay and so stop breeding... and it is stupid. If a small amount of the planet are homosexual, have the right to marry, they will still be unable to conceive children... unless they go for a variety of OTHER means both social and scientific.
Immediately, your argument about that which affects animals will likely effect us is shot out of the air and left to crash in a crumpled heap on the floor. 2) So what? Is this just you saying animals can't be lesbians?
Does this have any sort of relevance? Perhaps if I read on there will be something that gives this statement a point. 3) Do you notice that we put a lot of funding into keeping the physically and intellectually challenged alive and capable of having a chance at life equal to any other human?
We've stopped killing mutants since the dark ages. We're not going to start killing homosexuals because a book or because your obsession with animals tells us to. 4) I'm pretty sure we covered this way back in point 1.
Moving on... 5) okay, okay, enough. I need to know... ARE you just taking a speech someone else wrote out and cutting it into points? These don't seem to be varied topics of considerable discussion, it seems to be the same point made over and over again.
6) yeah, I think you pretty much just proved my answer to 5. 7)Homosexuality has become a threat only to conservative opinions of homosexuality. You say they're 'trying' to procreate through scientific means... there is no trying, it works... and it's not a threat to anyone.
8) "homosexuals are seeking to convert"? Answer: WROOOOOOONG! 9) it's all propaganda.
It's all plot-points from an unreleased 50's courtroom thriller "the gays that took over the world". I must have read this plot a hundred times and it's STILL garbage, no matter who writes it... or, in your case, who copies what someone else has written. Short answer: WRONG!
There ya go. Homosexuality harms no one, the fact that they can't reproduce together is irrelevant as many heterosexual couples can't reproduce, start making that argument against one group of people and you may find yourself trying to explain why its still okay for heterosexuals who cant reproduce to marry, the only argument you have will be bigoted and discriminatory. That's at least three, I'm done refuting BS.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.