Using force when you think your life is in danger is a just and needed legislation. However, your first responsibility is too flee if all possible. If Treyvon was unarmed then why couldn't the shooter escape.
I still think the "self appointed" neighborhood watcher was an over zealous cop wannabe. As a former cop I have seen his kind before. They just do not have enough to make it as a real cop so they get as close as they can.
It was my pleasure several times to lock them up. I almost killed one one night in a warehouse with a reported open door. He got there first and went in without waiting.
He can now identify the end of a 12 gauge Mossberg riot shotgun! As far as the left is concerned, simply look at England where it is unlawful to protect yourself.
What I have heard from "the left" and what I object to strenuously is the Sanford Police Depatment's interpretation of the Florida Stand Your Ground law from which this apparently inept police department has concluded that George Zimmerman cannot be charged with any crime in connection with the shooting of this unarmed law abiding young man. If in addition to uncovering and evaluating all the facts surrounding this shooting, which is typically the duty of a competent law enforcement agency, the citizens of Florida choose to further debate the wisdom of their state's Stand Your Ground law following this shooting, they are free to do so. It doesn't matter one bit if "the left" drives this debate either.
This being a democracy and all.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.