How do you compare Dravid with his predecessor Sourav Ganguly [Images]?

Ganguly was more aggressive and assertive. He got the best out of his players and turned India into a winning team. He was always prepared to take risks.

Dravid also has earned respect of all his players. His performance in terms of win-loss is also quite good, both in India and abroad. He is leading a team full of exciting and experienced players.

But he has to be a bit more adventurous at times. How are our chances in the inaugural Twenty20 World Cup in South Africa? It's a very difficult question to answer. Of course, we do have a few good players for this kind of cricket.

But my main concern is India's poor fielding. It has suddenly become very poor and the ongoing one-day series in England affords the best example of how poorly our players field. And a poor fielding side stands no chance of doing well in Twenty20 cricket.

But we've a special fielding coach in Robin Singh, haven't we? Yes, and that's why it's even more shocking why Team India is fielding so badly. I don't mean ... more.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.