Because anyone with half a brain can realize that The evidence for evolution is and has been interpreted from a Philosophical and ideological Bias, The answers given by adherents to Evolution here in R&S is proof of the bias and agenda, Atheism has to have an alternate explanation—other than a Creator—for how the universe and life came into existence. Darwin once identified himself as a Christian but as a result of some tragedies that took place in his life, he later renounced the Christian faith and the existence of God. Evolution was invented by an atheist.
What is sad is that Christians are falling into this Trap and trying to fit evolution into the Bible (Theistic Evolution) thinking they can make it fit. Lee Stroble in his video listed below “ The Case for the Creator” stated (5 min. 28 sec into the video) The Case for a Creator http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=... That “There is no way you can Harmonize Neo Darwinism with Christianity, I could never understand Christians who would say “ Well I believe in God yet I believe in Evolution as well” You see Darwin’s idea about the development of life led to his theory that modern science now generally defines as an undirected process completely devoid of any purpose or plan,”.
Now how could God direct an undirected process? How could God have purpose in a plan behind a system that has no plan and no purpose? It just does not make sense.
It didn’t make sense to me in 1966 and it doesn’t make sense to me now. The Apostle Paul wrote to His Son Timothy stating that “ in 2 Timothy 4:3-4 “For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables. Those Christians who believe in evolution have no idea how that effects their theology.
What is theistic evolution? http://www.gotquestions.org/theistic-evo... http://carm.org/secular-movements/evolut... Eternity is a Long Time to be wrong about this What Hath Darwin Wrought? http://www.whathathdarwinwrought.com Darwin's Deadly Legacy (1 of 7).
Cos they're quite stupid is the only answer that fits... other than, while they practice disinformation and misdirection people's attention is focused elsewhere rather than on cretinism... the most absurd thing anyone ever came up with... *poof*... MAGIC... yeah, right ;) “Fact = verifiably accurate data Law = statement which is always true under specific circumstances Hypothesis = testable, potentially falsifiable, explanation of facts/laws Theory = unifying framework explaining all of the above.” “All the available evidence from any source anywhere supports permits or aligns with evolution unanimously and exclusively… there is no factual evidence against evolution but if there was that would not be evidence for creationism.” “For evolution to be a fake the following conditions would have to be fulfilled: > Every university in the world would have to be in on the deception. > Every biologist would have to be a liar. > Every teacher of science would have to be in on it.
> And most of the other sciences too. > The majority of drugs could NOT have been invented… > Nor would they work. And so on…” ... or something like that ;).
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.