Because Romney created a STATE healthcare system, that only applied to Massachusetts. As compared to Obamacare, that was passed through a series of bribes and deceptions, and not an honest vote, and would force every person in America to purchase healthcare. Arguably unconstitutional.
It could also be argued that what Romney passed in Massachussetts was the will of the predominantly liberal voters who live there. Whereas Obamacare was opposed by an overwhelming majority of voters nationally. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_c... http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_c... And Romney has also learned lessons from the healthcare legislation that passed in Massachussetts, things he would not do again if he were passing healthcare legislation now.
Romney is also a proven leader in both the public and private sectors, who built a corporation, then turned the 2002 Winter Olympics from a failure he inherited into a very successful event. And as Massachussetts governor, set the state on a path toward stable long-term growth. A potential president who understands economics with proven management skills is clearly something our country needs.
He didn't have much choice, only 3 people in the state senate backed him in anything. It was either work with it by removing pork or veto it and then the dems get to do as they like. He was a good governor compared to the crap we had since I been born.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.