In regards to picture quality which is better, plasma or LCD TV?

Similar questions: picture quality plasma LCD TV.

LCD TVs versus Plasma TVs Comparison Plasma televisions LCD televisions Advantage Screen Size Screen sizes range from 32 inches to 63 inches. Larger plasmas, like a 103 inch unit from Panasonic, are in production, but are still prohibitively expensive for consumer use. Sizes range from 13 inches to 45 inches.As with plasma, there are larger LCD TVs made, like a 100 inch display recently released by LG, but they are not readily available or affordable at the consumer level.

Plasma TVs are the current size champions, particularly when comparing TVs that consumers can easily purchase. LCDs are catching up in size with their developing technology, however, and may surpass Plasmas in the near future. This may be due to difficulties in producing glass large enough for larger plasmas.

Viewing Angle Up to 160° Up to 175° LCD TVs have the advantage here, but by a small margin. Your viewing experience is not going to be ideal at 160 or 175 degree angles. LCD TVs used to have a problem in this area, primarily because LCDs were originally used as single person computer monitors.

Screen Refresh Rates Plasma displays refresh and handle rapid movements in video about as well as CRT televisions. LCD TVs were originally designed for data display, and not video. Therefore refresh rates had to be improved.

LCD TVs with refresh rates below 16 ms or lower (5-15 ms) show very few noticeable artifacts. LCD TVs are now available with refresh rates as low as 5ms. Slight edge to plasma technology.

Burn-in or Stuck Pixels Plasma TVs can suffer from burn-in produced by static images. After extended periods, stationary images "burn in" and produce an after-image ghost which remains permanently on the screen. With technologies such as 'pixel orbitor,' new plasma TVs have addressed burn-in and significantly reduced the issues of older models.

LCD TVs do not suffer from burn-in, but can have a "retained pixel charge" which may also produce ghosting. Stuck pixels are also possible with an LCD display. With the latest plasma technology, this is less of an issue than ever before.

"Pixel orbitor," for example, is one method of reducing burn in used by plasma manufacturers. It requires no additional programing from the end user as some older burn-in prevention techniques did. If you plan to use a plasma for gaming, some games with permanent 'dashboards' may still cause some burn-in.

Check user-manuals for available solutions by model. Product Life-span Plasma TVs have a reported half life of 30,000 to 60,000 hours. Half-life is the time it takes the lamp to fade to half its original brightness.

LCD TVs also have replaceable backlights, but the expense of replacing one when the time comes may be greater than simply replacing the entire TV. Both Plasma and LCD technology should more than adequately satisfy most consumers. The average CRT TV (the kind most of us have at home) has a half-life of around 25,000 hours.

If the average American household watches an average of four to six hours of television a day, even a 30,000 hour lamp would give you over 16 years of use. By then you'll be enjoying your new 'Holodeck.' Weight Plasma displays are fairly heavy, and may need additional supports to be mounted onto a wall. LCD TVs weigh less than comparably sized plasma TVs.

LCD TVs are considerably lighter, more portable, and cheaper to ship. Durability Plasmas are very fragile making them tricky to ship and install. Unlike the commercials where plasmas are mounted on the ceiling, plasmas are best installed by a professional, and should be installed on a wall that can bear a good deal of weight.

Much more durable than plasmas. End users can easily mount an LCD TV themselves if desired. LCD TVs are far less fragile than plasmas.

Shipping Due to their fragile nature, plasma TVs need to be shipped by specialty carriers. Overnight or fast delivery options are not recommended. Special shipping methods and their heavier weight add to higher shipping costs.

Shipping LCD TVs is not difficult, and is not as expensive as shipping plasma displays. LCD TVs are lighter and far less fragile than plasma displays making shipping easier and less expensive. Installation Plasmas are heavier, use more power, and run hotter than LCD TVs, and therefore require more planning when mounting them.

Plasmas are generally best installed by professionals. End users can easily install LCD TVs themselves, or can use them just as they use a traditional TV using a stand. LCD TVs are much easier to install than plasma TVs.

Brightness/Contrast Plasma TVs report higher brightness and contrast levels than LCDs. Under ideal conditions (no ambient light) this is a true advantage of plasma technology, because LCD TVs are backlit and therefore light must be blocked to create blacks. Plasmas have individual pixels that either on or off, creating deeper blacks and better contrast.

LCD TVs can often look better in 'real-world' situations. Plasmas are made with a special glass surface that can reflect light, which dulls the brightness and contrast of the image. LCD TVs reflect very little light, allowing them to maintain levels in well-lit rooms.

Both LCD and plasma TVs will meet the brightness expectations of most consumers. However, in 'real world' situations with ambient light, LCD TVs will generally look a little brighter. Thickness As thin as 3 inches deep.

As thin as 2 inches deep. LCDs TVs are just a bit thinner. Performance at gh Altitude gh altitudes can affect the performance of plasma displays because the gas held inside each pixel is stressed, and has to work harder to perform.

Some manufacturers make plasmas that are specifically designed for high-altitudes, but they may be priced higher than standard models. LCD TVs are not affected by high altitudes. LCD TVs.

We carry both consumer and commercial grade flat panel displays. Plasma Televisions | LCD Televisions | Mounts and Accessories | Tutorials | Downloads Want to SEARCH? See the top right corner of any page.

Flat TV People . Comflattvwebmaster@projectorpeople. ComGet thin.

From the experts.1-877-845-0044 Toll Free | 1-813-261-7184 International - Se habla espa ñol. Copyright 1999-2007 Projector People. All rights reserved.

Sources: http://www.flattvpeople.com/tutorials/lcd-vs-plasma.asp .

One isn't automatically better than the other. They both can have excellent pictures. But the pictures vary a lot, so you have to read up on individual models.

But you can make a few generalizations. LCD’s tend to be brighter, so they work better in rooms that can’t be darkened (say if there are lots of windows without blinds. ) But they tend to have poor "black levels", i.e.

, their blacks tend to not be very dark. In some of the worst TV’s they are actually a dark gray or blue. They can have higher resolutions (more dots) than plasmas, but at typical viewing distances, you often can’t see any improvement.In particular, the new 1080p tv’s aren’t visibly better, even to trained eyes.

They are slightly thinner. They tend not to be as good with moving images, as in sports. The newer sets with refresh rates of 120 Hertz should be better with that.

Plasmas have slightly wider viewing angles (how well you can see the picture when you are sitting off to one side), and often better black levels. But they consume more power, and some make a buzzing sound, especially at high elevations (like in Santa Fe.) They do have a slight potential for burn-in (where a static picture left on the screen for many, many hours becomes burned into the screen permanently), but that has improved quite a lot, and it is probably no longer an issue in real life. But the kicker is the price.

Plasmas are a lot cheaper, often 40% or so, than LCD’s of the same size and quality.So for $1400, you can get a top-notch 42" plasma, or a middling LCD. Which would you choose? I chose a plasma, after leaning to LCD's for a long time.

I got a Panasonic TH-42PE77U (their latest 42" model or close to it, but the PE is a model apparently sold only at Costco and the like. ) I love it. $1300.

According to the salesmen, the top brands are Panasonic and Samsung. To my eye, the Panasonic had a slightly softer and more realistic quality. The Samsung had an excessively sharp, almost wiry look.

But that might also have been the tv's settings in the store. Supposedly you shouldn't rely too much on how things look in the store, because the store is much brighter, and you are much closer, than you would be in your living room. Things like sharpness are easy to see, but color accuracy is much harder to judge by eye.So you should rely on the reviews.

Here is the text from Consumer Reports’ comparison of LCD’s versus plasmas. It isn’t available to non-subscribers, so I am posting the entire text (without the price info, since the article is over a year old.TV types: Weigh pros, cons, and prices LCD TVs Quick take: Trendy flat screens with decent picture quality, but larger screen sizes are more expensive than other types of TVs. Common screen sizes: 23 to 45 inches.

Manufacturers have showcased sets as large as 82 inches. Pros: Thin and light. Can be wall-mounted.

The best are capable of displaying bright, detailed images. Some new 1080p models have excellent overall picture quality. Antireflective screen minimizes glare from bright light.

No risk of burn-in of static images. Cons: Price goes up sharply as screens get bigger. Most sets can’t display deepest black or distinguish subtle shades of gray and black.

Fast-moving images may blur. Image may dim as you angle away from center of screen, especially up and down. Long-term reliability not yet known, but our initial data indicate low rate of repairs during the first year of use for several major brands.

Plasma HDTVs Quick take: Big, bright screens with a real wow factor. Common screen sizes: 42 to 60 inches. Manufacturers have shown sets as large as 103 inches.

Pros: Thin and light enough to be wall-mounted. The best are capable of displaying excellent images with high brightness and contrast and crisp detail. No limit on viewing angle.

Bigger sizes are cheaper than LCD TVs of comparable size. Cons: Shiny surface can produce distracting reflections in bright lighting. Some newer plasmas have an antireflective coating, like that found on camera lens, to deal with the reflections problem.

Brightness may dim over time. Fixed items displayed for long periods can leave ghosted image i.e. , burn-in.

Some sets don’t include speakers or a tuner. Long-term reliability not yet known, but our initial data indicate low rate of repairs during the first year of use for several major brands. CNET has a comparison of the two technologies, which can be found here: http://www.cnet.com/4520-7874_1-5108443-2.html?tag=arw .

It's a matter of personal opinion This is an impossible question to answer in black or white form. Your best bet is to go to a showroom and take a look and choose for yourself. To help, there are a number of technical details that will determine your decision.

Some things to consider are: Resolution - number of pixels (or dots) that can make up the picture (the higher the number the better). Usually expressed as something like 1024x768, 1366x768, 1920x1080. The first number is the number of pixels across the screen from left to right, the second number is the number of lines from top to bottom.

Response Rate - the rate at which the pixels can be switched on or off in order to produce a nice picture that doesn’t smear when moving objects are displayed. Expressed as a number of milliseconds, the smaller the number the better. Contrast - the difference between the blackest black and the whitest white.

Expressed as a ratio such as 10000:1. The higher the number the better. Burn In - the tendency for an image to be permanently etched into the screen if it displayed for long periods.

Having said all that, here’s some pros and cons: PLASMA Pros: Better contrast and response rate than LCD Cons: Burn In is possible, but newer sets have improved. Life expectancy inferior to LCD according to some sources (I don’t recall where I learned this). LCD Pros: Burn In impossible Cons: Response rate and contrast generally poorer than Plasma, but catching up It pays to understand these specifications and make comparisons between various sets, both when comparing the two technologies and when comparing sets within the same technology.

Other than that, it just comes down to personal preference. There are inherent differences in the look of the two technologies. Personally, I can’t wait for SED televisions to come out.

The specs on those beat Plasma and LCD hands down. Some people (myself included) strongly believe a good quality CRT television still offers the best picture, for now anyway. Sources: personal experience and electronic knowledge gained over the years .

11-2011If your TV room is bright, get an LCD and sit as directly and squarely in front as possible, just like you do with your LCD computer monitor. If your TV room can be toned down or darkened with less light, go with a Plasma, for the richer colors, better contrast and wider viewing angle. As far as burn in, that shouldn't be a concern for the average TV watcher, unless you leave the very same unchanged image on the screen for weeks.

Either model, look for RCA audio outs to plug in a powered sub-woofer (example: 10-12 inch, 100w-150w continuous output), and skip the surround sound (and added remote control), you won't need it. Last but not least, don't settle for a screen smaller then 50 inches, as you'll always be dreaming of bigger.

Vertically compressed video image on plasma or lcd TV's.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.