Is it a Fact or an Opinion that Fox News is bias towards the Right?

Well you're making a generalization, first of all. Lots of people watch Fox News for lots of different reasons. Some people watch it ironically just for entertainment.

Some people only want to hear what O'Reilly says. Other people tune in just for Judge Napolitano and can't stand the other pundits. Some people (like me) watch cable news on both sides in order to track disinformation trends.

Those who watch Fox believing it to be more accurate or fair than other corporate mainstream media gateways do so, by and large, because they see it as the lesser evil. These are people who don't appreciate being referred to as "crackers" by Chris Matthews, or admonished for their belief that the Bill of Rights is still relevant. On the other side, many choose MSNBC or CNN as the lesser evil, because after 8 years of pro-war propaganda and outright lies under Bush, the very sight of the Fox logo causes involuntary regurgitation.

I can sympathize with both points of view. But I also realize that anything coming from big corporate news outlets (on either 'side') should be taken with a HEALTHY dose of salt. All of the media is filtered, so whichever flavor you prefer, it doesn't really matter.

You're not being informed, you're being programmed. Most people don't understand how partisan 'debate' in the mainstream media can be used to control public opinion. The danger lies in the following statement: "The truth lies somewhere in between."

This sounds reasonable enough, and this is how reasonable people get fooled. We are shown two 'opposing' sides of a political discussion, and these become the 'boundaries' of the debate. Any position that does not fall on one side, or somewhere in between, is considered 'radical,' or more often, NOT CONSIDERED AT ALL.

So, if point A is the mainstream left's position, and point C is the mainstream right's, the Truth does not necessarily lie at point B. Point B is the conclusion that social engineers HOPE we arrive at. The Truth, however, is usually far, far away, where you would never consider looking, because neither 'side' presented it as an option.

To learn more about these techniques, there are three terms you should read about: The Overton Window* The Hegelian Dialectic The Delphi Method I hope one day soon this all becomes common knowledge. In our current political system, each side tends to be fairly good at pointing out the criminality of the other party. Simultaneously, each side is wholly BLIND to the criminality of their own party.

For the independent analyst who is able to step outside this mass delirium and see both sides for what they are, the overall criminality is mind-boggling. There also appear to be certain points which are off limits for discussion, even when talking about the other party. I'm talking about the really criminal stuff.

The further you go up the power structure, the more insane and corrupt things seem to get. This is where the two parties are revealed as one single power structure, controlled by the same private corporate interests. THESE are the Truths that NEITHER SIDE is willing to touch, because to expose the other party would likewise expose their own.

In this way, both sides are biased against the Truth. They will not talk about 800 pound gorillas in the room. They only want to talk about the ticks and flies on their backs.

And if you ask, "but what about those gorillas over there?" they laugh and say, "What gorillas, you fringe lunatic? There's no such thing as gorillas." To learn about the gorillas, you need to go out and seek information for yourself.

Real information is POWER, and nobody is going to give it away on the TV. You need to go out and take it for yourself.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions