It would have absolutely no affect at all. We usually mention Michael only when discussing Daniel or Revelation or 1 Thessalonians 4:16, anyway. It is an identification based on similarity of role, as described in Scripture.
For us, this identification is a logical possibility, in the "reasonable to conclude" category. But we don't pray to God in Michael's name. We pray in Jesus' name.
In short, we give as much attention to Michael as the Bible itself does, which is comparatively little. Jesus also has the name "Immanuel." ((Matthew 1:23) But Christians usually call him "Jesus.
If it was proven that Jesus was not Michael it would have absolutely no bearing on any of the beliefs you mentioned. Michael is mentioned in exactly five scriptues: Daniel 10:13, 21; 12:1 Jude 9 Revelation 12:7 If the description of Michael in these five verses does not apply to Jesus it would not affect the overall picture of Jesus that the Bible has painted. For anyone who does not believe Jesus is Michael I'd be curious to know why Michael seems to have angels under his authority at Revelation 12:7 when the Father has put all of the angels under Jesus' authority.
(Hebrews 1:6).
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.