Should we borrow $700 BILLION from the Chinese for tax cuts for 3% of the population?

That is not what the republicans are planning.

Since tax cuts are not spending, your question makes no sense. We should, however, cut that same amount in spending in order to have some tax cuts. How does NOT TAKING SOMETHING = SPENDING?

You're spinning it. Extending the tax cuts will mean $700 Billion in less revenue across those years; BUT, I think that's a good thing. More for individuals and less for the War Machine, the Waster, the Nanny State.

Bush increased the debt because he cut taxes WITHOUT CUTTING SPENDING. What part of cutting spending don't you libs understand? Nobody advocates tax cuts without spending cuts.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.