The Brady Bill passed strict regulations on assault rifles - that definition never included fully automatic...?

"Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.... the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons" -US Supreme Court ruling in the case of District of Columbia vs Heller. "Do not separate text from historical background.

If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government." -James Madison. Founder, Framer & 3rd President of the United States. America's Second Amendment rights are to muzzle-loading, single-shot weapons.

That's what was in common use at the time the Second Amendment was created. That's what America's founders and framers granted America's the right to keep and bear. Americans have no explicit right to own anything but muskets.

Pretending they've got rights to military rifles is just them subverting/perverting like Madison said.

Now 50% of gun homicides are committed by black people even though they make up only 13% of the population. Wouldn't it make more sense to crack down on the drug dealing inner city gangs if you really want to reduce gun homicides? Oops too politically incorrect for Obama's zombies.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.