What is Gun Control Law? Who wants Gun Control Law? Why?

I back very few gun control laws. One is I do not believe that criminals, or the mentally ill should be allowed to purchase firearms. In a truly moral and civilized society, people exclusively interact through persuasion.

Force has no place as a valid method of social interaction, and the only thing that removes force from the menu is the personal firearm, as paradoxical as it may sound to some. When I carry a firearm, you cannot deal with me by force. You have to use reason and try to persuade me, because I have a way to negate your threat or employment of force.

The firearm is the only personal weapon that puts a 100-pound woman on equal footing with a 220-pound mugger, a 75-year old retiree on equal footing with a 19-year old gang banger, and a single guy on equal footing with a carload of drunk guys with baseball bats. The gun removes the disparity in physical strength, size, or numbers between a potential attacker and a defender. A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force monopoly.

Then there's the argument that the gun makes confrontations lethal that otherwise would only result in injury. This argument is fallacious in several ways. Without guns involved, confrontations are won by the physically superior party inflicting overwhelming injury on the loser.

The gun is the only weapon that's as lethal in the hands of an octogenarian as it is in the hands of a weight lifter. It simply wouldn't work as well as a force equalizer if it wasn't both lethal and easily employable. The gun at my side means that I cannot be forced, only persuaded.

I don't carry it because I'm afraid, but because it enables me to be unafraid. It doesn't limit the actions of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those who would do so by force. It removes force from the equation, and that's why carrying a gun is a civilized act Mormon guy.

Sorry to hear you are so very uneducated that you are unaware of how the Second Amendment reads. Let me see if I can educate you here just a little. The Second Amendment reads: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, This means that to form an armed militia the PEOPLE have to keep and bear arms, and that is only one of the many reasons our fore father protected the peoples right to keep and bear arms, not the only reason as the next part shows. "the right of the PEOPLE to KEEP and BEAR arms shall NOT be INFRINGED.

I hope in light of Boston being on lock down due to a mad bomber running loose in the neighborhoods, most people realize the need to have guns to protect their families in their homes. What would you do if you were forced to shelter in place for 23 hours and the madman chose your house for his last stand? I bet having an AR-15 with a 30 round mag for home defense doesn't sound too crazy in that scenario now does it?

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.