Why do Republicans and Democrats both point at the other side and blame them for all the problems in the world?

Hustlers will do anything to get elected just as in 08'T, no matter how pulling a tantrum after a defeat is undignified & childish. There are plenty of issue that needs to be address & all they could do is use big bird & company (worth $400 million), to poke fun at an "Example" used concerning cutting back with entities that doesn't need a hand out. It took the incumbent a week to respond to that big bird remark using a team of staffers after the debate was over.

They're covering up Benghazi, fast & furious, alqueda has been weakened lies (lara logan blast mid east policy) & internet donations from foreign donors who may be influencing the incumbent's policy to increase these foreign interest bottom line through subsidies, foreign aid, or regulating/limiting U.S. domestic production of coal, oil, & nat gas in which ethanol, solar, windmill & multimillionaire (D) with off shore accounts investing in foreign oil & the green scheme such as the DNC chairman & the incumbent's adviser jarret. Ethanol subsidies, Non essential inefficient or extremely expensive Military tech, Oil subsidies (exchange it for land permits & domestic production), GMs tax credit, GEs tax Exemption, Solar Panel Co. , Solar Panel Buyer, Fiscar, Fiscar & Tesla Buyer (multimillionaire celebrities), Animal studies that doesn't affect Humans gravely, inefficient industrial public school system (must replace with something like internet classes (in-home grade 1-8), community wide home-schooling, charters, like Louisiana's), welfare abuse (re-instating work requirements: work, chores (city sanitation), or voluntary public services), etc are the things that needs to be addressed & dealt with.

Revenue neutral will make the tax code more efficient. Would you rather live on a budget & cut back or go bankrupt? Yahoo & the media have reported on a number of people who turned their costly lifestyle around by becoming fiscally responsible & frugal, why can't government?

As the case with Prichard AL & Stockton CA. http://www.thetrumpet.com/article/9615.8... How is devaluing the dollar (pay cut) further good for everyone? As the feds prints & buy back what they can't sell to international countries is nothing more than money laundering.

More borrowing & spending won't cut the deficit, just as it didn't cut the 9 trillion deficit to 4.5 trillion deficit & ended up with 17 trillion deficit instead. Australia's dollar use to be worth half that of the U.S. now ist worth more & probably 5 - 10 times more. Is the government's understanding of economics all about borrowing more money means the more money you can spend & since government can print money legally why not keep printing more to fund its society's costly lifestyle.

It's like a friend borrowing money from everyone close to them by faking cancer to go on a world tour or a lavish wedding. Its not about making money through trade, materials, goods, manufacturing, entertainment, or service, but making money by exhausting every ones money. Wealthy multimillionaire celebrities (entertainment indus.) & corporation will do just fine without loopholes, waivers, tax credits, & tax exemptions that partisan journalist (media matters, NPR, bill moyers), unions & corporations such a celebrity letting a bee farmer make honey in his/her land, Fi scar for wealthy celebrities, Unions health care waivers, GE's zero tax (exemption?), Gem's 45.5 Billion tax credit to attract investors despite 3 bailouts in the course of 6 months til GM finally filed for structured bankruptcy to change its destructive habits ending in the closing of hundreds of GM dealership, reduction of domestic production, boost & import productions from foreign (China) GM plants.

The incumbent is taking his own advise back when he accused his opponents in 08' that "if you have nothing to run on, then you paint your opponents as somebody to run from", an alinsky methodology. The incumbent's, inability to accept or take responsibility & endure scrutiny suggest that the incumbent's demeanor is that of a immature (childish) arrogant community that support the incumbent. Physical traits aren't the only thing that are inherited from our parents, but personality, arrogance, demeanor, behavior, & attitude, thus if we are all cursed genetically by our parents, more so if they are irresponsible.

Though the incumbent's genes inscribe as a white & lack hi breed, only the immature arrogant slacker lineage personified itself through the incumbent. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?... http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?...

Even President Bush admitted, finally, that Iraq played no part in 9/11, nor did they have any weapons of mass destruction. Watch the first link in Bush's own words if you doubt it. So how can you justify the war in Iraq as a legitimate response to 9/11.

From the beginning of operations through July 31, 2011, the Department of Defense allocated $704.6 billion for Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn. That comes out to about $3.8 billion per month. Then you have the billions America has spent since the war rebuilding Iraq.

Then take into account the 4,482 Americans servicemen and women who died in this war 30.000+ Americans wounded, to say nothing of the 100.000 dead Iraqi civilians. So 2,753 died on 9/11 and Bush's response was to send another 4,482 Americans to die invading a country which had nothing to do with it. Then you call those who question your assertion dumb!

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.