You got that right, the dems also had 2 years and did not attempt to pass a budget nor reduce spending.
Well to be fair Bush spent money like the democrats especially when he refused to veto the democrats bills once they took over in 2006.. But yes you got the logic correct. At least as a human being you are logical. Unlike our friends on the left.
See how the twists begin... Start mentioning that Bush inherited a 5 trillion dollar debt. And it was increased due to the housing regulations of fannie and freddie that clinton rubber stamped repeatedly putting the new costs in a projected budget. Not realizing that it would sky rocket demand once the government started backing all the bad sub prime loans.
And you were looking at a debt of around 8 trillion that Bush inherited. And remind them that it took Bush 8 years 2 wars 9/11 the TARP bailout (dems created) and the DOT COM BUBBLE. It took Obama 2 years to create the same amount that Bush had in 8.
But they use the same mental gymnastics for that as well. Get in the mind of a liberal... Scary and frightening. I like the ones that say they voted for Obama only because he wasn't Bush or a Republican.
That actually holds more ground then to say they voted for Obama cause they thought he would fix the economy.. LMAO laughable and frightening.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.