Will the Tea Bagger movement catch on with liberals dems like the Tea Party has caught on with conservatives?

Because Obama is clinging to all he has been taught , and all he knows from his idol , the marxist / socialist Saul Alinsky ...These are the Alinsky Rules that motivate`s Obama every move ......... Any effective means is automatically judged by the opposition to be unethical. You do what you can with what you have and clothe it in moral garments. Goals must be phrased in general terms like "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," "Of the Common Welfare," "Pursuit of Happiness," or "Bread and Peace."

Alinsky also had rules for what he called "power tactics" or the means used to "take." He described it as "how the Have Nots can take power away from the Haves." Here are his rules of power tactics.

Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have. Never go outside the experience of your people. Whenever possible, go outside of the experience of the enemy.

Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.

This rule is why Obama is meeting with Republicans**** { A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. } Keep the pressure on with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.

The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside. The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.

Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Even a cursory review of these rules for radicals reveals that a union activist schooled in them will have no compunction about using almost any tactic in a conflict with a public agency. ***In fact, radicals must often create issues to stir up problems in order to radicalize their potential followers.

With careful forethought any of these tactics can be defeated, but in order to do so one must sometimes play by the same rules as the radicals. For example, the tactic that seems to shock public officials the most is the personalization of the attack. For the radical, it is not sufficient to attack the "administration" or the "board" they must attack a particular administrator or board member.

This is "outside their experience." They are not accustomed to having questions raised about their personal character because of differences of opinion on public policy questions.

People in the tea party movement don't want high taxes and a nanny state like the progressives need to take care of their personal short comings.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.