Federal government suing Arizona but giving sanctuary cities a pass.....see details?

washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jul/14/jus... Asked by childof1truegod 17 months ago Similar questions: Federal government suing Arizona giving sanctuary cities pass details Politics & Law.

Similar questions: Federal government suing Arizona giving sanctuary cities pass details.

Immigrants Looking at America from New Zealand I would be shocked to read that Mexicans are rounded up and put into a prison compound, just as I am still shocked about the Australian's doing the same to the "boat people". We let some of them into New Zealand. I know, as I teach them English.

But, then, after reading what you have had to say about the Mexicans using your healthcare, and not paying taxes etc I can understand how you feel. But you have to put yourselves in the shoes of a Mexican and how you would feel about it all. Like me, they see American sit coms with the most amazing houses and you get the impression everyone must be rich over there.

I know of course, you are not all rich, as I have visited twice, stayed in a caravan parks (some of which were amazing and enormous), and stayed in ordinary and amazing houses. Unless you see America first hand, it is hard to form an opinion being so far away. The Mexicans must see Americans as wealthy, and make lots of money.

If you were poor, no job and no home, and all you need to do is cross the border, would you no risk it? There must be a humane way to solve the problem. Video Wow!

This is racist. I didn't know such groups existed.

1 It is hypocritical but it illustrates the ideology of the current administration. Let illegals in and once here, let them stay.

It is hypocritical but it illustrates the ideology of the current administration. Let illegals in and once here, let them stay.

2 It's another example of the selective prosecution we have seen recently. We can pass laws but if they're not enforced, what's the point? Apparently it's OK to break the law, you just need to know which laws are enforced.

Don't guess wrong.

It's another example of the selective prosecution we have seen recently. We can pass laws but if they're not enforced, what's the point? Apparently it's OK to break the law, you just need to know which laws are enforced.

Don't guess wrong.

3 It seems wrong that the DOJ will sue Arizona whose new law supports the federal immigration law but they will not even attempt to sue the cities that are in direct violation of the same federal immigration law.......

It seems wrong that the DOJ will sue Arizona whose new law supports the federal immigration law but they will not even attempt to sue the cities that are in direct violation of the same federal immigration law.......

Jaxk replied to post #3: 5 It's pretty obvious that this administration does not want to deport anyone. Therefore Sanctuary Cities would be something they support. The most recent tact is to audit the employers, fire the illegals but not deport them.

That way we get to support the illegals (education, healthcare, welfare) even more since they no longer have a job and wait for comprehensive reform so we can give them voting rights as well. This is a long range strategy. There is an unintended consequence to all this.

If you have a spanic applicant and white or black applicant for the same job, do you pass on the spanic and save yourself the possible ramifications of a mistake? Maybe. This will tend to racially profile much more than the Arizona law ever could and spanic will be a hire of last resort.

But on the upside, when the comprehensive immigration law is passed, there will be a lot more democratic voters. So I guess they feel the trade off is worth it.

It's pretty obvious that this administration does not want to deport anyone. Therefore Sanctuary Cities would be something they support. The most recent tact is to audit the employers, fire the illegals but not deport them.

That way we get to support the illegals (education, healthcare, welfare) even more since they no longer have a job and wait for comprehensive reform so we can give them voting rights as well. This is a long range strategy. There is an unintended consequence to all this.

If you have a spanic applicant and white or black applicant for the same job, do you pass on the spanic and save yourself the possible ramifications of a mistake? Maybe. This will tend to racially profile much more than the Arizona law ever could and spanic will be a hire of last resort.

But on the upside, when the comprehensive immigration law is passed, there will be a lot more democratic voters. So I guess they feel the trade off is worth it.

Seems like Arizona was just a start. " "What law do you think the government should pass in this country?" "Can the Federal Goverment sue Arizona over Immigration Law?

Is arizona immigration bill the same as federal immigration law.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.