Is this rumor true? Facebook changing pictures to cartoons just for pedophiles?

That depends on how you define pedophile. But that's the whole point I guess. I'm not a psychologist, and obviously I don't know anything about how accurate these tests were.

But I'm willing to accept that some common assumptions about human sexuality may be inaccurate. But the important thing to realize is that if true, this doesn't mean pedophilia doesn't exist, it just means we're measuring the wrong thing. Maybe the real defining feature is a lack of attraction to adults, or weak impulse control, or something no one has thought of yet.

In any case I think it would be an excellent idea for psychiatrists and psychologists to stick to science and leave moralizing to philosophers, politicians and clergy.

I think that's possibly a matter of opinion. What worries me is your choice of title. What, exactly, is an 'erotic' picture of a child?

I don't believe there's such a thing. Children ARE not and CAN not BE 'erotic'.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.