Liberals- Is this Voter Intimidation?

The outrage isn't there because no one with legal standing complained about their actions except for a single Republican poll observer, who was only interfered with by one King Samir Shabazz. It has to do with legal standing to complain more than anything. Those cases where liberals claimed voter intimidation in 2000, like this one in 2008, completely lacked standing because it could not be ascertained whether or not a voter actually refused to vote as a result of actions by the NBP.

In 2000, it was because the stops were made a far distance away from polling sites, and it cannot be ascertained what one was intending to do next. If a voter with standing complained of being denied elective franchise, the left would listen. Thus far, none have, unless NewsBusters is claiming that records of complaints have been destroyed.

Why am I harping on standing? Because this was a civil lawsuit. To the person below: Threatening a poll observer is the same as voter intimidation.

Samir did just that against Christopher Hill, a poll observer.

The Black Panthers haven't been around for decades. This is a manufactured video, meant to stir up racial hatred. A true "liberal", or as I prefer, progressive, is opposed to voter intimidation of any kind, be the victim white or black.

And Bush did steal the election, both times. He turned out to be one of our worst presidents and will go down in history as a complete failure.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.