Hypocrisy is the rule, not the exception for either of our inept political parties. Scott, bullspit, killed two US citizens in a drone strike. The 16-page memo, a copy of which was obtained by NBC News, provides new details about the legal reasoning behind one of the Obama administration’s most secretive and controversial polices: its dramatically increased use of drone strikes against al-Qaida suspects abroad, including those aimed at American citizens, such as the September 2011 strike in Yemen that killed alleged al-Qaida operatives Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan.
Both were U.S. citizens who had never been indicted by the U.S. government nor charged with any crimes. In one passage in Holder’s speech at Northwestern in March, he alluded – without spelling out—that there might be circumstances where the president might order attacks against American citizens without specific knowledge of when or where an attack against the U.S. might take place. The Constitution does not require the president to delay action until some theoretical end-stage of planning, when the precise time, place and manner of an attack become clear,” he said.
I'm currently and have always been against the drone policy. I think it may have started as "surgical strikes" to get rid of al-Qaeda, but I think that is expanding to an unacceptable degree. However (again, while I disagree with it), I thought you guys were all about wiping out terrorists wherever they stand.
Or sit. Or sleep. This article is about people who are proven to be an imminent threat overseas.
And has happened once.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.