What is the importance of the assumption of ethics?

It is not clear what is meant here by 'the assumption of ethics. ' What may be meant is assuming what is generally referred to as "the moral point of view Discussion about assuming the moral point of view is commonplace in many modern ethical discussions. It is indispensable when discussing ethical theories that are nonrealist, noncognitivist, or both nonrealist and noncognitivist.It is because of the popularity of these theories that talk about the moral point of view is common It's not clear what "the moral point of view" means.

Typically, it stands opposed to ethical egoism. An ethical egoist is attached to self-interested prudentialism.An ethical egoist thinks of himself as having one and only one basic obligation, namely, to promote what is best for himself. An ethical egoist could care less about what is good for others By way of contrast, adopting the moral point of view takes what is good for others into account.

It is a disinterested position, not a self-interested position Should an individual (like you or me) adopt the moral point of view? What is the justification for adopting a position that might sacrifice what is best for me in favor of what is best for others? This is an important question.

When we are deciding what to think, say, or do, how should we decide? What considerations are relevant? How we answer may have a great impact on the quality of our lives.

That's the importance of the issue concerning whether or not to adopt the moral point of view.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.