Why do you think the progressives in America are so ineffective at the national level?

Everybody has the right to raise their voice,if they are not doing anything now after getting some better response,may be they will do a lot for the party. :) DR. DURRESHAHWAR PERVEZ.

Quantitative easing is a Neoliberal economic policy though, not a progressive policy. The last time progressive economic policy was enacted in the United States was during the Keynesian era from FDR to Reagan. Though those policies would not be considered truly progressive under current progressive economic theory.

Austrian economics has been running the ship since Reagan and it hasn't exactly left us in a favorable position. For reference, a progressive economic theory to counter point the Austrian school/Neoliberal old guard would be Modern Monetary Theory (also known as Chartalism). You can get a basic run down here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chartalism and I'd suggest reading this article to see the theories in action: http://www.thenation.com/article/159288/beyond-aus.

Because, when given time, their policies and ideals are shown to be ineffective. A good example is the "Quantitative Easing" which was merely printing money. Economics 101 will tell you that make the money worth less and therefore things cost more.

The Progressives typically concentrated on city and state government, looking for waste and better ways to provide services as the cities grew rapidly. These changes led to a more structured system, power that had been centralized within the legislature would now be more locally focused. The changes were made to the system to effectively make legal processes, market transactions, bureaucratic administration, and democracy easier to manage, thus putting them under the classification of ‘Municipal Administration’.

There was also a change in authority for this system; it was believed that the authority that was not properly organized had now given authority to professionals, experts, and bureaucrats for these services. These changes led to a more solid type of municipal administration compared to the old system that was underdeveloped and poorly constructed. Many progressives such as Louis Brandeis hoped to make American governments better able to serve the people's needs by making governmental operations and services more efficient and rational.

Rather than making legal arguments against ten hour workdays for women, he used "scientific principles" and data produced by social scientists documenting the high costs of long working hours for both individuals and society. 16 The progressives' quest for efficiency was sometimes at odds with the progressives' quest for democracy. Taking power out of the hands of elected officials and placing that power in the hands of professional administrators reduced the voice of the politicians and in turn reduced the voice of the people.

Centralized decision-making by trained experts and reduced power for local wards made government less corrupt but more distant and isolated from the people it served. Progressives who emphasized the need for efficiency typically argued that trained independent experts could make better decisions than the local politicians. Thus Walter Lippmann in his influential Drift and Mastery (1914), stressing the "scientific spirit" the "discipline of democracy," called for a strong central government guided by experts rather than public opinion.

One example of progressive reform was the rise of the city manager system, in which paid, professional engineers ran the day-to-day affairs of city governments under guidelines established by elected city councils.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions