If protection from labor-intensive imports was the only motivation behind the push for a trade-labor linkage, one might expect to observe one of two responses to the worker rights conditionality in GSP: Because the program is relatively small after all the exclusions, it might not attract much attention from unions or other "disguised protectionists." To the extent there is activity on this issue, one would expect a protectionist motivation to result in disproportionate targeting of the largest and heaviest users of the program. The numerous limitations on access to GSP benefits are intended to reduce the impact on import-sensitive sectors in the United States and this no doubt helps dissipate potential protectionist pressures.
In the 1990s, total imports from BDCs as a share of total US imports averaged only around 15 percent while duty-free imports under GSP were only 2-3 percent (table 3). Thus, the impact of GSP on the US economy is quite small, thereby reducing motives to ... more.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.