Have you hugged a Jehovah's Witness today? Or even bothered to thank them?

Trump: Crazy as a loon. Insecure. A bully.

Very clever, but not too smart. Cruz: Also crazy, but being outshadowed by Trump. Very smart.

Evil. Carson: Very intelligent. A nice guy, but knows almost nothing about world or domestic issues.

A brilliant pediatric neurosurgeon. (In addition to what I've read, I know some people who've been directly affected by Carson; he's the real deal medically.) Christie: I kind of like him--yes, he's a New Jersey pol, but straight talking and seems to have a human side. Problem is, his "schtick" is the blustering, tell-it-all in-your-face politician, and Trump's cornered that territory this time around.

Paul: I really like his positions, especially internationally. There's a lot to be said for libertarian views, especially on human rights. Too bad no one's listening.

Rubio: He just strikes me as a lightweight. A very lightweight. Fiorina: Smart.

Good debater. Delivers a great speech. But she has a poor history of managing companies, and virtually no political experience.

Kind of like Ronald Reagan without the political background or experience. Clinton: Absolutely corrupt and dishonest. Plus, dangerous views on foreign policy.

O'Malley: Rational. Intelligent. Overall, good policies.

But no one's listening. Sanders: A good guy. Good morals.

Intelligent. Straight shooter for a politician. (I'd love to see a debate between Sanders and Christie!) But I wish he had a more fully-formed policy agenda.

He's right about income inequality, but there are other pressing issues, too.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.