I just watched that match (on youtube) so I knew Cena won before I watched it, which did kinda spoil getting "into" it, meaning yeah Cena got mauled by a grizzly bear but I knew he would win anyway. I have two problems with the match: 1. It was "extreme rules", meaning anything goes yet they stopped the match twice to "control Cena's bleeding".
That ain't how that match works. I've seen many matches in my lifetime where one wrestler, because of "blood loss", runs out of gas, loses strength, loses consciousness, etc and ends up losing the match. That IS the point of an "extreme rules" match, to batter your opponent and make him bleed buckets TO run him out of gas etc. so you can pin him.
I've seen matches stopped for blood (with the bleeder losing the match) but only in the WWE do they PAUSE a live match to fix boo-boo's and owies. It kills momentum and takes you out of the moment. I hate that.
I'd rather they just didn't have blood than pause the match, have somebody put on rubber gloves and wipe crap on the cut to stop it from bleeding. 2. The ref "getting knocked out" was unnecessary and overdone.
The point of the ref "getting knocked out" is so the bad guy can do bad things to the good guy without getting in trouble for it. But the match was "extreme rules", meaning anything goes. There was no point to the ref "getting knocked out" (so Lesnar could do more bad guy things to Cena) and made the whole stopping the match to "control Cena's bleeding" a contradiction.
Outside of those two niggles the match was very good. Lesnar was the unbeatable monster we expected him to be. He put Cena through the ringer, yes indeed, and Cena had to dig deep just to keep going.
Lesnar, like so many before him, underestimated Cena and got over-confident. The match WAS his but he did indeed underestimate Cena's resolve and toughness, and Cena got him with a great "shoot him with a bazooka" type of strike (the chain-wrapped fist) that Lesnar should have seen coming if he was paying attention to Cena. Lesnar's over-confidence cost him the match.
I think the match lived up to it's hype. Taker vs Triple H is still MOTY for me (in any promotion) but Cena vs Lesnar was a great match.
I liked the start of the match but Cena winning took the cake, I would say CM Punk Vs. Chris Jericho at extreme rules was the best match I have seen this year, it lasted longer and it was more evenly played out.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.